<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for zooie&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zooie.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>vik singh&#039;s (mainly techy) thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines by SEO</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/#comment-19367</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-19367</guid>
		<description>Eye opening, especially for Luciene users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eye opening, especially for Luciene users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines by Open Source Search Engine Comparisons</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/#comment-19324</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Search Engine Comparisons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-19324</guid>
		<description>[...] Engine Comparisons by lmetzler 7. July 2009 15:51 There&#039;s a nice little writeup on a comparison of various open source search engines.&#160; We&#039;ve been using Lucene and Lucene.Net (not explicitly tested) here at Bambit for many years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Engine Comparisons by lmetzler 7. July 2009 15:51 There&#39;s a nice little writeup on a comparison of various open source search engines.&nbsp; We&#39;ve been using Lucene and Lucene.Net (not explicitly tested) here at Bambit for many years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines by Open Source Search Engine Comparisons</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/#comment-19323</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Search Engine Comparisons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-19323</guid>
		<description>[...] Comparisons by lmetzler 24. October 2009 15:51 There&#039;s a nice little writeup on a comparison of various open source search engines.&#160; We&#039;ve been using Lucene and Lucene.Net (not explicitly tested) here at Bambit for many years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comparisons by lmetzler 24. October 2009 15:51 There&#39;s a nice little writeup on a comparison of various open source search engines.&nbsp; We&#39;ve been using Lucene and Lucene.Net (not explicitly tested) here at Bambit for many years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines by hanum</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>hanum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>wow.. great comparison. What about backlink crawl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.. great comparison. What about backlink crawl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Stats about Twitter&#8217;s Content by Mike Darnell</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/some-stats-about-twitters-content/#comment-19291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Darnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=371#comment-19291</guid>
		<description>Hi Vik,

Great post and very insightful even though I admit I didn&#039;t quite follow all the math.

It&#039;s the type of stuff I&#039;d expect Twitter to be publishing themselves more often.

Cheers,
Mike
http://Semantinet.com/publishers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vik,</p>
<p>Great post and very insightful even though I admit I didn&#8217;t quite follow all the math.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the type of stuff I&#8217;d expect Twitter to be publishing themselves more often.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Mike<br />
<a href="http://Semantinet.com/publishers" rel="nofollow">http://Semantinet.com/publishers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Stats about Twitter&#8217;s Content by Squarespace Review &#187; Posts about Squarespace as of October 14, 2009</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/some-stats-about-twitters-content/#comment-19274</link>
		<dc:creator>Squarespace Review &#187; Posts about Squarespace as of October 14, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=371#comment-19274</guid>
		<description>[...] Thursday, which included my Granddaddy who just turned 90. Ninety. As in 10 away from a hundred.   Some Stats about Twitter’s Content &#8211; zooie.wordpress.com 10/12/2009 Near the end of July, I crawled a sample of ~10M tweets. On [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thursday, which included my Granddaddy who just turned 90. Ninety. As in 10 away from a hundred.   Some Stats about Twitter’s Content &#8211; zooie.wordpress.com 10/12/2009 Near the end of July, I crawled a sample of ~10M tweets. On [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Stats about Twitter&#8217;s Content by SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 13, 2009</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/some-stats-about-twitters-content/#comment-19268</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 13, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=371#comment-19268</guid>
		<description>[...] Some Stats about Twitter&#8217;s Content, zooie&#8217;s blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some Stats about Twitter&rsquo;s Content, zooie&#8217;s blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Stats about Twitter&#8217;s Content by Tim</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/some-stats-about-twitters-content/#comment-19267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=371#comment-19267</guid>
		<description>Interesting stats, especially the compression rate analysis. Would have guessed that Twitter being “quite” international, the corpus would have been much larger and thus compression not as high as the results you’ve come up with.
I hope that one day, Twitter will provide us with some real and exclusive stats about their data. That’d be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stats, especially the compression rate analysis. Would have guessed that Twitter being “quite” international, the corpus would have been much larger and thus compression not as high as the results you’ve come up with.<br />
I hope that one day, Twitter will provide us with some real and exclusive stats about their data. That’d be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines by A Deep Dive Analyzing the Results of ~10M Crawled Tweets &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/#comment-19266</link>
		<dc:creator>A Deep Dive Analyzing the Results of ~10M Crawled Tweets &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-19266</guid>
		<description>[...] of this data. Several posts have analyzed Twitter’s traffic stats [TechCrunch] [Mashable] [zooie], so I thought I’d focus more on the content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of this data. Several posts have analyzed Twitter’s traffic stats [TechCrunch] [Mashable] [zooie], so I thought I’d focus more on the content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo! Boss &#8211; An Insider View by Vik</title>
		<link>http://zooie.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/yahoo-boss-an-insider-view/#comment-19263</link>
		<dc:creator>Vik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooie.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-19263</guid>
		<description>This cannot be done in a single query with BOSS. Might be possible with many queries via individual or grouped site restricts (can do ~30 domains in a single query) with post-search filtering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cannot be done in a single query with BOSS. Might be possible with many queries via individual or grouped site restricts (can do ~30 domains in a single query) with post-search filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
